Are ALJs considered quasi-judicial?

Administrative Law Judges (ALJs) are indeed considered quasi-judicial because they function similarly to judges in a court of law but within an administrative framework. They have the authority to conduct hearings, make findings of fact, and issue decisions regarding disputes involving regulatory compliance and other administrative matters. This quasi-judicial role entails interpreting and applying laws, adjudicating disputes, and ensuring that procedures follow the legal standards set for administrative processes.

The quasi-judicial nature of ALJs is highlighted by their ability to evaluate evidence and render binding decisions on legal and factual issues, which aligns with traditional judicial functions. However, unlike traditional judges, ALJs typically operate within an administrative agency and are not part of the formal judicial system, which is why they are referred to as quasi-judicial. This distinction is important in understanding the role and authority of ALJs in the larger context of administrative law.