What is an example of good cause for which a President can remove a chairperson from an agency?

The correct answer is rooted in the legal framework governing federal agencies and their leadership. A President can remove a chairperson from an agency for reasons that directly impact the functioning and integrity of that agency. Inefficiency or malfeasance in office exemplifies a failure to perform duties effectively or conduct oneself properly in the role. These conditions undermine the agency's mission and can prompt the need for a change in leadership to ensure continued accountability and effectiveness in serving public interests.

Other choices touch upon relevant concerns but do not align with the standard of "good cause" as established by legal precedent. Personal disagreements represent subjective conflicts that do not necessarily justify termination. Political pressure from Congress, while influential in agency operations, does not serve as a legal basis for removal without other grounds. Financial conflicts of interest could be a serious issue but must be clearly established and tied to malfeasance or inefficiency to warrant removal. Therefore, the identification of inefficiency or malfeasance as good cause aligns with established principles of accountability and governance in federal appointments.