What was the court's holding in the FDA vs. Brown and Williamson Tobacco Corporation case?

Study for the LEGL 2700 Hackleman 3 Exam with comprehensive questions, each accompanied by detailed explanations and hints. Ace your exam preparation today!

The court's holding in the FDA vs. Brown and Williamson Tobacco Corporation case established that the FDA does not have the authority to regulate tobacco products. The ruling emphasized that the legislative intent, as reflected in the Tobacco Control Act and other congressional actions, indicated that Congress had specifically not included tobacco products under the FDA's jurisdiction. This legal decision underscored the distinction between regulating food, drugs, and devices and the tobacco industry, noting that Congress had chosen to keep control over the regulation of tobacco primarily with itself, rather than delegating that authority to the FDA. Thus, the court's conclusion aligns with the notion that explicit congressional action is required for the FDA to gain regulatory power over tobacco products.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy