What will the court request in a review of factual determinations?

In a review of factual determinations, the court seeks sufficient evidence to a degree of certainty to ensure that decisions made are supported by a solid foundation of facts. Factual determinations are crucial because they form the basis for legal rulings. The court must ascertain whether the findings made by a lower court or administrative agency are backed by adequate evidence that meets the required standard of proof. This means that the evidence must be persuasive enough to support the conclusions reached in the case, thus leading the court to validate or overturn those findings.

The other options, while they may have their place in legal proceedings, do not directly address the specific need for factual evidence in the context of a court review. For instance, internal agency documents or testimonies might be part of a case, but the core requirement for the court in reviewing factual determinations is to evaluate the sufficiency and certainty of the evidence presented to substantiate the facts at hand. Recommendations for future cases might be useful for guidance but are not part of the core requirements the court considers during a factual review.