Which circumstance may lead to a review of agency decisions based on procedural aspects?

A review of agency decisions based on procedural aspects often stems from the requirement of exhausting all available remedies before seeking judicial review. This doctrine mandates that individuals must go through all administrative procedures and appeals available within the agency before turning to the courts. By doing so, it ensures that the agency has had the opportunity to address the issues internally, which may include procedural errors or other concerns. If the agency's process wasn't properly followed or if the decisions were based on procedural defects, this could be the basis for a review.

This principle of exhaustion also allows courts to respect the autonomy of the agency and its expertise in specialized areas while providing an avenue for addressing grievances. If parties skip this step, courts may dismiss their appeals on procedural grounds, emphasizing the importance of adherence to established administrative procedures. In summary, exhausting remedies leads to a more focused examination of procedures followed by agencies, opening the door for reviews where procedural fairness is in question.