Which criticism of administrative agencies pertains to procedures?

The criticism of administrative agencies that pertains to procedures focuses on delays in the decision-making process. This concern stems from the bureaucratic nature of many administrative agencies, which often have complex rules and procedures that must be followed. These procedures can lead to slow response times when it comes to processing applications, issuing permits, and rendering decisions on regulatory matters.

Delays can cause significant issues for individuals and businesses affected by the agencies' decisions, leading to uncertainty and potential financial losses. Additionally, prolonged decision-making can hinder the agencies' responsiveness to emerging issues, reducing their effectiveness in addressing new challenges in their respective areas.

In contrast, the other criticisms listed do not specifically address procedural issues. For instance, difficulties in enforcing laws focus more on the practical application and authority of the agency rather than how it processes decisions. Variations in law enforcement over time relate to inconsistencies in how rules are applied, which is more about enforcement rather than the procedures that govern decision-making. Meeting frequency refers to how often agencies convene but does not inherently indicate a flaw in their procedural framework.