Which of the following statements is true about the removal for cause limitation?

The statement that it secures a stable and independent workforce for agencies is accurate when discussing the removal for cause limitation. This limitation is designed to protect employees from arbitrary dismissal by requiring a legitimate reason for termination. By placing this safeguard, it promotes job security and fosters a stable, independent working environment within agencies. This stability is essential for maintaining integrity in government and public service roles, as it allows employees to perform their duties without the fear of unjustified termination, thus enabling them to act in the best interest of the public and carry out their responsibilities effectively.

The other statements do not accurately reflect the role or implications of the removal for cause limitation. For instance, while it may seem that unqualified appointees could be easily dismissed, the requirement for a valid reason actually complicates this process. Additionally, while some may argue that the limitation affects agency efficiency, it primarily serves to ensure just processes and accountability. Finally, the assertion that it was entirely eliminated by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) is incorrect as SOX primarily addresses corporate governance and financial disclosure, without completely overturning existing legal protections for agency employees regarding removal policies.